Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Yuji's avatar

Great roundup. The 'model plus measurement' framing is the right lens here. Most commentary focuses on the AI angle, but the real play is acqui-hiring access to rare longitudinal multimodal datasets that took decades to assemble. Having followed these deals closely, I think the FDA's shift toward single-pivotal trials with confirmtory real-world evidence is what makes these parterships strategically different: it's turning data moats into regulatory moats.

The Future Clinic's avatar

The $100 whole genome keeps coming up in lectures as the threshold where sequencing stops being a specialist tool and becomes a routine clinical one. But I wonder whether the bottleneck just shifts at that point. Most hospitals do not have the bioinformatics infrastructure to act on a whole genome meaningfully. Does cheaper sequencing accelerate that investment, or does it just create a larger backlog of data nobody knows what to do with?

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?